• about direct democracy

     

    COMMENTS_CORRECTIONS_CRITICISM on BB?BG?DD?on Aki Orr's book

    (BB-big bussines rules, BG big governementlike in former USSR rule, DDeveryone decides policy)

    A lot of the DD-book is indeed usefull to me. Why ? In the first place because in a way it seems you try to do the same as I,namely, clearing up a lot of misunderstandings about the history of mankind. So my response to your view on history is very positive. I do not know which roads took you to end up with the positions you took.

    In my case it was a road of studying all material one can find these days on the internet, everytng from progressive people working in social democracy, unions and the more or less independent left wing of socialism, wether they work inside or outside the social democratic left.

    Somethimes I still attend their reunions or correspond or support them on some issues, but for a long period already not as a member of their associations. Again...why ? In practice it are the only people where one can have a political dialogue with. Like in Israel I presume. Probably working over there amongst people stll is more difficult then in Belgium. But indeed, like you write as well, I am constantly tryiing out new ways of communicating with people outside the circle I mentioned.

    I have a philosophical as well as a cultural project to catch peoples attention and try to build in a lot of humor and I try to find a way of making politics more fun then the boredom the BB-type of handling society offers us. I'm not intending to write this answer as a purely theoretical pamflet , but I hope to add a lot of practical exemples in it, so it isn't as easilly forgotten as most purely theoretical pamflets are. Practical exemples also help to comprehend faster.

    Why change the powers of BB in the world and have a vote on everything ?

    In my case : to end first of all the wars that are goiing on and to stop poverty and ignorence.

    The end-goal wefare and wellbeing for everyone, a complete insight in the meanig of life, not everyone playing videogames all day long, but opening peoples mind for the real joys of consciousness.

    'Truth is not reality'. Comment. Indeed it's a good thing starting with a philosophical introduction. Describing all in detail is impossible and one has to make a choice between the relevant and irrelevant. You refer to the internet a lot in your book and it's a good method to try and make readers less lazy. Observing what is goiing on in classical media is an art itself. Main lesson indeed : which group in society tells what from it's point of view. If one reads 'Condleza Rice' one should in fact read 'chevron' or 'shareholders' for exemple. One must always have the complete puzzle of human culture in ones mind to interpretate and judge and even predict. Information coming from different kind of left-wing organisations is no luxery and usefull if you can surmount it with a broader view.

    Criticism. Part of the succes of BB-rule is due to the fact that BB and religion and negative emotions have a conservative influence on the political awakening of a lot of people. For exemple take the Netherlands and Belgium. Forhundred years ago the Netherlands (Pays Bas in French) took a step towards protestandism and freed themselves from the influence of Catholisism à la Espagnole in those days...life was nothing but hardship and burden and you had to sit it out. Like in the Flemish part of non- existing-Belgium in those days, also in the Netherlands people wanted to interpretade the bible in their own way, but military we were defeated...as we were by every other country in Europe...we also know what it is to be a 'Jew'. Those days are gone, but a lot seems to be hidden in the collective awareness of people. Aldough mentality changes it is still more typically Dutch to vote on parties on the left side of social-democracy. Lately in the Netherlands we noticed that when people are fed up with politics they vote from one election to another on a right wing populist group(the Leefbaar (viable)Nederland Party of the right wing populist Fortuyn)...and if they don't deliver they will vote for the Greens and the Socialist Party, both situated leftside from the traditional social democratic party. (they nearly good all three together 51 procent of the vote).

    The flemish part of Belgium on the contrary moves to the right with an important right wing populist party that differs from the Netherlands populist parties by beiing more etnically-orientated.

    They cling to the old parties over here (max.1,5 % for the left wing while in Holland plusminus 18% voor Socialsit party, a little less for the Green (groenlinks) and plusminus 20 %for socialdemocrats of the Dutch PVDA(partij vd 'arbeid'-labour). I know that in the meanwhile you are thinking...'why is he telling me all this'...well to show you what holds individuals conservative in their thinking...not only the media and their social struggle for survival, but also their collective past. A Flemish reaction in a restaurant where one gets dry sandwiches would be saying to ones compagnon “ these sandwiches are indeed dry”. Someone from Holland would surely go to the barkeeper and complain...and get other sandwiches. Recently in the flemish part of Belgium there is a shift in social democracy of wanting to take over the leadership of the party by the left side.

    Over here they haven't got that mentality of talking over things deeply, they are very practically, and it isn't the style over here of debating to much. They are more hard-workers then hard thinkers.

    Socially a part of us envies does who were put on pension earlier the others and there isn't a real sence of unity in the communities...unless something 'happens' or there is a concert against the policies of the right spectrum of politics. Travelling in France I noticed (especially in the south) that people more easily great each other and are more open to conversation.

    What I would like to add in your first chapitre is the following...a kind of missing link in your book : 'how can philosophical thinking, based on the scientific progress of the last decades add something that liberates people from the conservative things in religions or, when they do not have any religion, what can liberate them from their depressive attitude towards life, and by that I don't mean the material things, politics represent. Alow me to refer to a text I had to translate from Dutch to English, my latest text on philosophy. It deals with things that Marx underestimated and that a guy like Khomeiny used in an obscure way...namely which vision do we have to offer on the question of 'the meaning of life' outside the political and social meaning...in relation to dyiing as well. When I worked in my job in a telecomcompany in the time (now I do not any more, 'to old, to expensive and not fast enough any more) I noticed that people were more intressted in things like 'divorce' and emotional problems then in politics. So I started studying psychoanalyse and other things as well, but that is the second part of the puzzle that you , do not write about (the first part the phylosofical point of views...not the individual points of few of everyone with a name in the history of phylosofy, but the global evolution in thinking as I have written about in essays that are only available in Dutch). This isn't a real thing that is missing in your introduction...maybe it's for the better that you do not mention those phenomens about the other side of the meaning of life in your book...it would make things to complicate. I just want to say that it are two existential piece of the puzzle one has to keep in mind. But basically a lot of them you sum up towards the end of your book when you give some good humanly advice about treating people like you yourself should be wanting to be treated. (it comes from religion, but those things are philosophy as well).

    I have read your book twice now (once on internet)and I really am gratefull you send me the book...a book invites more to read at ease. You have a very original view on history and you repeat some things somethimes, but one cannot repeat somethings enough to make sure something of the theoretical contributions start living a life of their own in the head of readers. I agree on most all of the things as you describe them, that is not a problem...I even got more and more impatient towards reading in detail how then DD should function. I liked a lot your quoting the early meaning of 'demo-kracy' (every citizen choosing on political positions themselves). I shall add another word that is misunderstood 'communism' (it means a society with only production and distribution, no money (surely not used in a speculative way) and no trade. Just like May1968 in France was a premature experiment towards DD...peoples minds are not ready for a world where money is the only thing that makes one go to work every day. 'Beiing and having real insights in life' should become more important then 'having', 'possesing'. This even surpasses the political and cultural needs that came to the surface in may68. Part of the meanig of life is the daily-life proces in which people must discover this. Like I said, you give a briljant description on history and I could not critisize a lot of relevant things , maybe later. What I do want to put your attention to is the fact that those who are part in possesing the infrastructure in BB have a lot of power to even start civil wars when things turn against them. We must find ways to avoid this, think about tactics to avoid this. Cooperate with progressive people who have partly the same goals as we...otherwise DD will end as fundamentalists as well. As to your alternative it is clear as well and I will add in annex my alternative as well. Main differences are your 'lotery'-system and my second round after the votes on programmatic issues...where there are still representatives that will have to execute the program (I call them 'dirigents' like in an orchestre)...if they do not conduct the 'piece of music' that the 'ensemble'(the employees) have decided to play, they can be replaced. It's a good ting to create pools of experienced people on 'project'-lists instead of partylists I would say, but that 'lotery'system I will have to think about this.

    You answer yourselve at a lot of difficulties DD can give, so don't feel obliged to go all over the main objections DD encounters in debates. Main difficulty to me seems that a lot of people owning properties or small shareholders would behave in a reactionary way once the vote on who is entiteled to own what is put on a voting-debate.

    About creating DD-comittees. Some left-wing groups here go from door to door to collect signatures against the raising of the price of garebidge-sacs by one Euro (bit more then dollar) as the average income of a worker is 1500euro a month...they try to improve BB and are afraid beiing called utopians. Others collect signatures against the splitting of Belgium in a flemisch and wallon (french) part...their credo 'save solidarity'(social security). The media creates thes 'moods', ordinary people do not want any seperation. Typical for the crisis in Belgium and BB is that they cannot form a new governement for the moment...(BB is stuck in ethno-thinking, they want to make te flemisch part cheaper for the boses, but most people are carrie away by the police-tv in their houses.

    Maybe it is an opportunity to promote DD-thinking, but then I would have to stop doiing my other kinds of research on the psychological field...if I at least could start up a group that is.

    What do people want to change over here ? Not the trafic rules, that's for sure. More justice and uniformisation in taxes. Giving jobs to the native inhabitants first(that would be an ethno-outcome of dd-voting)...so it is important to put the right questions to people and have a global program concerning all of the worldpopulation. An important DD-proposition would be the right to vote on goiing to war in another country or not, to stop wars,having the right to decide about foreign policies... . -that's what's most important. If in 2003 Unions in the US would have gone on strike to stop the war, that's what BB is afraid of...that could have stoped the war, like I told an american woman-activists who lost her son in Irak...not just walking and demonstrating.

    The only real struggle that could mobilise people is for the right to have a descend income like I told the Kurdich PKK-sympathisers in Belgium, together with Turkish workers. The next step on the urgent-list is something like DD...but consciousness of people has to get ready...in the meanwhile we can support BB-leftwingers against the right-BB-ers...selectivly...and keep on insisting about the need to chage the society-management in a DD-way. How long can Keynes and Galbraith-ideas help survive BB...can you predict ? Do you have a chrystal-bal ? I haven't.

    What seems to me important to me as well is aproaching things in a philosophical way.

    BB is in crisis but stronger then ever...exept in some States in South America where the swing goes to BG. Should this be critically suported...or should we encounter the BB-left wanting more BG-style of management as ennemies...I don't think so...the different roads of many mide come together one day, due to yet onforseen circumstances.

    What is that philosophical attititude I was talking about ? Wondering why we are stressed for exemple. Do we take time for 'silence' and nature, reading ? Have we overcome our negative emotions (the ones we vote represent parts of them...so we somethimeget what 'we'deserve.

    How to obtain objective knowledge...I try to teach it over here. How to develop the stronger part in oneself. How to discover what personal relations are all about. How to show solidarity with others, with people serving just purposes. How to avoid that overconsuming spoils your inner evolution.

    How to see the symbolism of the meaning of life in daily life-happenings. How to realise that each has to do his part of the work and not profits of others ( a problem that Marx underestimated in his 'everyone contributing in his way, taking in his way)How to understand that money is not a purpose, but a means, for the time of beiing. How to explain that we are not here on this earth to work like madmen and that a lot of the work can be abolished. (Here in Belgium the Post-office is goiing to sack 7000people...it's bad and one should support the strike-movement, but at the same time in the back of our head think about modern technology advancing, making post-office unnessecary in a future world ...so this group has more time to study DD...to find out that some big economical sectors really should be owned by the State again...moving in to the direction of BG before the decades(?) to give birth to DD are passed. How to use Arts as a means to get closer to the real meaning of personal and social and political evolution. That's my way of working.

    I'll take my time, if there is no demand or response, one cannot 'sell'. (joke : these things only cost us). But we know why we do it. To sop the benefits BB wants to reconquer from generations having fought for them ...and to manage the big companies from beneath. If in a first step we cannot touch the owner-issue...they will have to be taxed uniformaly throughout the world.

    To end this pamflet you can vote now : yes or no to the following program :(english, french, dutch available) Isn't it more preferable to start DD-comittees on one lobal program then starting with DD-exercises in the raing of garbidge-sacs prices with one Euro ?

    C.O.N.S.C.I.E.N.C.E. , the Committee for New Simultaneous International Elections ,Necessary to Create more Equality
    PROPOSES YOU TO VOTE ON
    A COLLECTIVE ALTERNATIVE ____________________________________________________
    PEOPLE's DATA STANDARDS
    SUPPOSE 'MONEY' WOULD only BE SOMETHING TO HELP US COUNT INSTEAD OF SPECULATE, then some paintings wouldn't be as expensive as building houses and feeding
    thousands of poor people.
    SUPPOSE all STATES , FIRMS AND COMPANIES WORLDWIDE;
    WOULD PAY EVERYONE THE SAME MONEY FOR THE SAME WORK : a minimum amount THAT IN AN ECOLOGICAL WAY PROVIDES IN EVERYTHING MODERN LIFE HAS TO OFFER.
    SUPPOSE TEACHERS WORLDWIDE DON'T teach more than ten pupils each class and carbuilders would refuse to much flexibility.
    Suppose THAT ALL MATERIALS, GROUNDS, GOODS and services HAVE A GLOBAL STANDARDISED PRICE expressed in one single worldcurrency.
    SUPPOSE EVERYBODY WHO DOESN'T WORK IN A SOLIDARY WAY RECEIVES LESS.
    (except really sick people)
    SUPPOSE EVERYONE's ADMINISTRATION IS BEING DEALTH WITH IN one way :
    EACH ONE NUMBER, ENLARGED WITH 3 LETTERS THAT CONNECT THE PERSON WITH ONE OF THE 15 PROJECTS IN LIVE :
    FOOd / HOUsing / WORk / SECurity/ HEAlth/ EDUcation/ ENErgy/ PROduction / DIStribution/
    TRAnsport / ENVironment/ MONey/ TELecommunication/ SOCiety / RELations/
    SUPPOSE EVERY PUBLIC SERVICE IS BEING PAYED BY AN EQUAL CONTRIBUTION OF EVERYBODY (once a month automatically taken from our wage
    , before we get it) , a system that would make public transport and the highways of
    telecommunication accessible for everyone , a system that if there already only was more social maturity, could be used in other areas too ( goods or certain services) .
    SUPPOSE WE WOULD UNITE AND PUT FORWARD OUR PROGRAM ON ALL 15 PROJECTS AND HAVE A WORLDWIDE ELECTION ON IT …BEFORE WE ORGANISE WORLDWIDE ELECTIONS AS TO PUT IN CHARGE THE LOCAL, PROVINCIAL , CONTINENTAL AND WORLDWIDE DIRIGENTS OF EACH PROJECT.
    SUPPOSE THE QUALITY OF LIFE BECAME MORE IMPORTANT THEN A LOT OF BUREAUCRATIC AND COMMERCIAL STUPIDITY…suppose we all learned to become aware of our real consciousness that looks to enrichen itself by means of our collective and individual history.
    Let us first give some motivation for each of the projects and let us add a first list of our demands on each project before we compose some standard files or start constructing the election file on our demands so far as the program itself is concerned.
    ________C.ON.S.I.E.N.C.E. _________________________
    COMMITTEE FOR NEW SIMULTANEOUS INTERNATIONAL ELECTIONS, NECESSARY TO CREATE MORE EQUALITY
    ______________________________________________________________________________
    PRESENTS THE 15 PRO.CO.C.I.T. - PROJECTS
    PRODUCERS CONSUMERS COLLECTIVIZE INTERNATIONALIZE TELEMATISIZE_:::::each person and company or institution…will administratively belong to one of the fifteen projects. ::::::each consumer has his place (number)in one of the projects and their sectors…. _____________________________________________________
    ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
    P R O J E C T W O R K
    _______________________________________
    ----MOTIVATION : A LOT OF PEOPLE EXPERIENCE THEIR WORK AS BORING BECAUSE THE TOTALLY FREE MARKET DOES NOT PROVIDE ENOUGH WELLPAYED JOBS FOR THEM.
    HAVING A JOB STILL IS NOT A RIGHT FOR EVERYBODY. WORKING-PEOPLE CANNOT CHANGE EASILY TO A NEW JOB BECAUSE OF THE SCARCITY OF JOBS.
    IN A NEW INTERNATIONALLY ORGANIZED AND STANDARDIZED ECONOMY, COMPETIVITY WILL NOT BE BASED ON EXPLOITATION ANY MORE, BECAUSE ALL PRICES AND PRODUCTION CONDITIONS WILL BE STANDARDIZED.
    THE HUMAN RESOURCES ADMINISTRATIONS OF FIRMS AND INSTITUTIONS
    MUST WORK WITH TOO MUCH DIFFERENT BUREAUCRATIC REGLEMENTS AND STATUTES.
    THERE IS A LOT OF WORK AHEAD IF WE WANT TO STANDARDIZE THESE TOOLS IN OUR COMPAGNIES ,WHILE WE WILL START WORKING ON ADMINISTRATIVE UNIFICATION.
    -----DEMANDS : PEOPLE WORKING IN HUMAN RESOURCES SHOULD CREATE INTERNATIONAL DATA TO WORK WITH , on the folowing bases :
    ° SAME WORK SAME PAY ° LESS DIFFERENCE IN PAY ( 1/2 maximum difference)
    °INDIVIDUAL PREMIUM OR INDIVIDUAL EVALUATION SHOULD BE WELL
    91
    ORGANISED ON AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE MEASURABLE OBJECTIV RESULTS
    °PEOPLE WHO STUDY SHOULD HAVE AN INCOME
    °EVERYBODY SHOULD BE ABLE TO WORK WITHIN REASONABLE DISTANCE OF HIS WORK
    ° …
    project t e l e m a t i c s
    ----MOTIVATION : THERE IS T MUCH ANARCHY IN THE USE OF THE LATEST DEVELOPMENTS
    IN TELEMATICS , THE REAL POSSIBILITIES ARE COMMERCIALIZED.
    -------DEMANDS : ° CREATION OF A TELEMATIC UNIVERSAL MANAGMENT SYSTEM (T.U.M.S.)
    A SYSTEM TO BE USED IN EVERYTHING THAT HAS TO DO WITH ORGANISATION AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE MANAGMENT OF THE PROJECTS AND THEIR SECTORS...
    IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO CONTROLE AND COORDINATE, each GOUVERNEMENT AND EACH
    MANAGMENT SHOULD USE THE SAME TUMS-system…to know about how many people ? where ?
    Who ? what ? how much ? when ?…
    ° TUMS SHOULD BECOME A PROJECT TO INTEGRATE THE 15 PROJECTS
    AND MANAGE THE SUPERSTRUCTURE OF MODERN AND FUTURE TELEMATICS.
    IN ORDER TO DO SO COMPANIES DEALING WITH HARD& SOFTWARE SHOULD UNITE TO CONSTRUCT ONE standardizedTUMS-plan, in stead of purchasing silly competition games.
    °massproduction of a MULTIFUNCTIONAL TELETERMINAL
    °
    project t r a n s p o r t
    ------MOTIVATION : TO STOP POLLUTION SINCERELY SOMETHING DRASTIC MUST BE DONE
    ____DEMANDS : ° FREE PUBLIC TRANSPORT mainly in the cities (payed by small equal contrib.)
    °
    project s e c u r i t y
    -----MOTIVATION : CRIMERATES , traffic AND WARS ARE KILLING AND SICKENING
    ----DEMANDS : °MORE SOCIAL JUSTICE IS LESS CRIME AND WAR
    °RECONVERSION OF WAR-ECONOMY
    °ARMIES SHOULD INTERNATIONALLY BE USED AS FORCES THAT HELP
    WITH NATURE-DISASTERS, BUILDING DIKES,,. helping fire -departement…
    °CREATION OF ONE POLICE FORCE FOR EACH KIND OF CRIME.(one data)
    °INTERNATIONALLY CONTROLED DESTRUCTION OF WEAPONS for war
    °TRAFFIC POLICE COULD USE SOME HELP WHEN THERE IS NO MORE 'work'
    IN THE ARMY
    project p r o d u c t i o n
    -----MOTIVATION : INSTEAD OF MOVING TOWARDS COOPERATION THERE ARE WARS GOING
    ON BETWEEN COMPANIES: THE VICTIMS ARE THE DISMISSED AND THE
    PEOPLE AND FAMILIES WITH TOO MUCH STRESS
    ____DEMANDS : °MANAGERS SHOULD CREATE WORLDWIDE FILES CONCERNING
    PRODUCTION/ STOCKAGE/PRODUCERS/ PRICES/DISTRIBUTION/
    TRANSPORT…for each single product or raw material
    °IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO DO SO THEY SHOULD UNITE
    92
    ORGANISATIONALLY IN FUNCTION OF THE PRODUCT THEY MAKE
    °NO MORE WASTE-ECONOMY :replacing and saving paper, wood…
    project d i s t r i b u t i o n
    -----MOTIVATION : different prices kill jobs alsO
    ___DEMANDS : °SAME PRICES WORLDWIDE MORE JOBS IN BIG STORES
    °EQUAL PRICES FOR SERVICES __FREE PROFESSIONS…
    project h o u s i n g
    -----MOTIVATION : MILLIONS LIVE IN TERRIBLE HOUSING -CONDITIONS OR PAY TO
    MUCH RENT
    ___DEMANDS :
    °INVENTARISATION OF HOUSES/ NEEDED HOUSES/ HOUSES TO BE REPAIRED/
    HOUSES TO BE BUILD/ …in order to be able to do so once again all kinds of firms dealing with housing
    , renting, building…should be obliged to join their information if they don't discover the benefits earlier.
    °STOP SPECULATION …why not a law that says that if you own more then one house you are obliged to sell it, in stead of renting it…why not then consider the rent as a pay of on long term ?
    °MORE NATURE IN THE CITIES (for example farms for children…)
    °ONE INTERNATIONAL RENTING PRICE
    °
    project h e a l t h
    ---MOTIVATION : THE HEALTH OF SOME ANIMALS SEEMS TO BE MORE IMPORTANT THEN THE HEALTH OF MILIONS OF PEOPLE WHILE THE WEST TAKES TOO MANY DRUGGS INSTEAD OF EXAMENING THE INFLUENCE OF STRESS AT WORK OR THE INNER AND OUTER RELATIONSHIPS OF THE HUMAN BEING AND ALL HIS SUBJECTIVE NEEDS.
    ---DEMANDS : °BETTER NOURISHMENT /HEALTH CARE IN THE THIRD WORLD
    °More natural forms of healing, less anti-biotics…
    °One equal anual contribution to pay for health-service (no more bureaucracy of 'getting your
    money back')
    °Birth Control Program
    project f o o d
    ---MOTIVATION : THE OLD SYSTEM INVENTS LAWS TO THROW FOOD AWAY AND TO FORBID PRODUCTION WHILE MILLIONS STARVE
    __DEMANDS : °HELP- PROGRAMS FOR POOR FARMERS EVERYWHERE
    (why not organised by the farmers and the tool-making industry here ?)
    project e n v i r o n m e n t
    ----MOTIVATION : YOU KNOW WE WILL HAVE TO LIMITE POLLUTION…if not…
    ----DEMANDS : °RECYCLING STARTS WITH SORTING THE CARBAGE
    °also look for measures in other projects (transport…)
    °MORE NATURE…
    °PROTECTING ANIMALS
    °hundreds of other measures
    project e d u c a t i o n
    -----MOTIVATION : GOUVERNEMENTS CUT ON EDUCATION TO SAVE THEIR BUDGET
    /TEACHING HISTORY , FILOSOPHY AND PSHYCHOLOGY FEW TEACHERS
    ARE REALLY CAPABLE OF THESE DAYS
    ___DEMANDS °CLOSER LINKS BETWEEN PROFESSION ANSD SCHOOL
    93
    °LESS PUPILS IN THE CLASSES (not more then ten is a good start)
    °LINKS BETWEEN THE PROJECTS WORK (human resources firms or human
    resources parts of compagnies ) and THE PROJECT EDUCATION
    and links also to the educational projects ( exams, …) in other projects
    °A LOT OF ATTENTION SHOULD GO TO THE PROJECTS PRESS AND
    CULTURE THAT COULD BE INTEGRATED UNDER THE PROJECT
    EDUCATION (why not separate nets for each kind of film, for documentaries…)
    Project e n e r g y
    -----MOTIVATION : NOT ENOUGH EFFORTS ARE BEING MADE TO SAVE OR PRODUCE ENERGY
    ___DEMANDS °INVESTING IN ALTERNATIVE WAYS OF GAINING ELECTRICITY
    °INVESTING IN EDUCATING IN SAVING
    project m o n e y
    ---MOTIVATION : THE SPECULATIVE ASPECT OF MONEY MUST DISSAPEAR
    _DEMANDS : °see PEOPLE's DATA(suppose…)
    °SIMPLE CONTRIBUTION FOR INSURANCE
    Project s o c i e t y (political managment)
    MOTIVATION : WILL THE 'LAST ONES' BE THE FIRST ONES IN HISTORY ? THE WORLD WAS ALWAYS RULED BY THE ONES WHO HELD THE ECONOMICAL POWER… IT WERE ALWAYS THE POWER-ATTEMPTS OF THE LAWER CLASSES THAT PUSHED history IN NEW DIRECTIONS : the ones who owned the land, the money, the means of production decided and still decide most of the time. DECISSIONS ON WHO HAS THE RIGHT TO HAVE A JOB OR ABOUT HUNGER AND WARSPENDING AND ENVIRONMENT SHOULDN' T BE TAKEN IN FUNCTION OF SPECULATION. TO MANNY PARTYMEMBERS OBEY THE money -minded SPECULATORS INSIDE AND OUTSIDE THEIR PARTY. UNION MEN MAINLY FIGHT FOR PARTIAL PROBLEMS AND AREN' T encouraged TO LOOK FOR GLOBAL SOLUTIONS AND ACTION…if they start doing so they are mostly thrown out anyway . Only somethimes people really show that they aren't afraid of change. Only some small groups try to organise those uprises…but they do not a collective alternative to manage society in an other way . Even if they have the same ideology, they stay divided because each group understands the historical background and future developments or the role from this or that group in society otherwise. IF THIS INTRESTS YOU …LET US KNOW.
    DEMANDS :
    ° ALL THE DEMANDS IN 'PEOPLE' S DATA' and THE DEMANDS OF THE PROJECTS AND A
    WORLD -WIDE REFERENDUM ON THIS, starting behind our pc's, in our pubs , reunions, companies…
    °IF ALL THIS CANNOT FIND HIS EXPRESSION IN THE CLASSICAL DEMOCRACY WE ENHERITED FROM HISTORY AND WHO TRIES TO DIVIDE US IN SO MANY WAYS,
    THIS MEANS IF POLITICIANS DO NOT LISTEN TO NECESSITIES THAT WILL IMPLEMENT
    THEMSELVES ANY HOW…THEY WILL LOOSE THEIR JOB FOR A CHANGE.
    °WHY COULD't WE REPLACE THE OLD SYSTEM OF ELECTIONS BY A NEW ONE ?
    Candidates for the local managment functions could present themselves on the lists of the projects, not on the list of the parties , except the list of the project 'society', where one still would be able to vote for the ones having to manage jurisdiction, adminstration of the population, notarial things (since politicians mainly are lawyers they would find themselves at home.
    PROJECT-ELECTIONS WOULD REPLACE PARTY-ELECTIONS MOSTLY , and THE ONES ELECTED PROVINCIALLY COULD ELECT THE CONTINENTAL

    GOVERNEMENT, who AT THE SAME TIME WOULD BE THE WORLD -GOVERNEMENT.
    The local counsels should be attended by the controling committees from neighbourhood or compagnie.
    But before we can have all this we must simply start with discussion- groups.
    New ways of protesting will emerge and are emerging.
    Project r e l a t i o n s
    __MOTIVATION : THERE ARE A LOT OF OBJECTIVE RELATIONSHIPS AS WE CAN EXPERIENCE THEM IN ONE OF THE MENTIONED PROJECTS OF SOCIETY.
    THOSE OBJECTIVE RELATIONSHIPS EVOLUATE IN A COLLECTIVE WAY JUST LIKE EACH HUMAN BEIING CAN EVOLUATE IN A PERSONAL WAY OF DEALING WITH THE SUBJECTIVE THINGS IN LIFE : AM I A NIHILISTE OR SOMEBODY WHO LIKES PHILOSOPHY , SCIENCE…, am I emotionally strong enough to have a good influence on those who surround me, however contradictory this good influence at first sight may seem ?
    IN MANY CASES THE BEHAVIOUR and thought OF MEN REFLECTS THE BEHAVIOUR OF THE RULING CLASS . MUCH IN RELIGION AND SURELY IN NATIONALISM STILL PREFENDS US FROM GETTING CLOSER TO OUR COMMON ROOTS. WHY too much SPECULATE ABOUT LIFE AFTER DEAD, WHILE THERE ARE ENOUGH TASKS TO BE FOUND HERE .
    Discovering why your life was and is and will be your life is much more interesting. ..it 's a rather personal voyage to wisdom. ANYWAY SCIENCE ALREADY PROVED ELECTRONS HAVE AN ETERNAL EXISTENCE…and because everything exists of electrons we will return to the elements we came from : the ever recomposing elements to be found in the earth, wind, light and fire…maybe even in the anti-matter …who nows ? All the elements together formed our spirit, that's for sure .
    ____DEMANDS :
    °LEARN TO COMMUNICATE WITH YOURSELF AND OTHERS
    °LEARN TO READ AND WRITE AND DISTINGUISH THE POSITIVE FROM THE NEGATIVE EVEN IF THE NEGATIVE SOMETIMES CONTRIBUTES TO THE POSITIVE, the positive must lead.
    °LEARN TO OBSERVE IN A VERY BALANCED WAY WHAT IS HAPPENING IN YOUR TOTAL EVIRONMENT.
    °LEARN TO DEAL WITH NEGATIVE EMOTIONS
    °LEARN TO ALWAYS KEEP ON WONDERING ABOUT THINGS AND PEOPLE LIKE YOU KEEP ON WONDERING ABOUT SOMEBODY YOU LOVE …everything and everybody can teach you how to make better choises…how to maintain your good vibrations better.
    °LEARN TO TRUST ON THE POWER IN YOU AND TO SOMETIMES HELP OTHERS ONLY BY TRUSTING ON THEIR INNER ENERGY, not by doing something they ought to do..
    °LEARN TO BE AND TALK HONNEST, also in it's sometimes strange ways

    ...
    LA LUTTE FINALE SE PREPARE CHAQUE JOUR...
    future modèle de gestion de société
    On doit restructurer la politique. C.O.N.S.C.I.E.N.S.C.E., le COmité pour des Nouveaux Elections Simultanés Nécessaire pour créer plus d'Egalité...vous propose de voter son :
    alternative collective
    Supposez l'argent serait quelque chose pour nous aider à calculer au lieu de spéculer...alors certains peintures ne seraient pas si chèr que construire des maisons pour
    des centaines de gens.
    Supposez que chaque Etat et compagnie sur une échelle mondiale payerait le même salaire pour le même travail, une quantité qui offrait d'une façon écologique la possibilité à avoir une vie humaine.
    Supposez que les enseigneurs mondiale pouvaient avir des classes de seulement dix personnes.
    Supposez que tous les matériaux et services avaient une prix unique, exprimé dans une monnaie mondial. Supposez que l'administration de chacun et chaque firme serait traité d'une même façon : chacun un numéro de téléphone, élargit avec trois lettres qui donnent connection avec chaque des 15 projets de la société : NOUriture/MAIson/TRAvail/SECurité/EDUcation/ENErgy/PROduction/DIStribution/TRAnsport/
    ENVironment/ARgent/TELecom/SOCiété/RELations
    Supposez que chaque service publique est payé par une contibution égale de tout le monde(pris une fois par mois de notre salaire avant qu'on le touche) Un tel système un accès presque gratuit aux transports et télécommunication. Ce système pouvait être élargit à d'autres secteurs(produits et autres services) pourvu il existerait une maturité sociale très large.
    Supposez qu'on nous organiserait et qu'on mettait notre collective à un aprouvenment internationale, avant qu'on organiserait le second tour de ses nouveaux éléctions pour élire les dirigents local, provincial , continental et mondiale des différents projets.
    Supposez que la qualité de la vie deviendrait plus important que beaucoup de bureaucratie et de stupidité commerciale.
    Supposez que qu'ondevenait conscient du fait que l'histoire nous pousse vers l'organisation d'un meilleur monde sans chomage, pauvreté, guerre, pollution...
    Pour chacun des projets on va donner d'abor un peu de motivation et après on va posser nos demandes. Il faudra aussi déveloper un 'site' pour voter sur l'internet.

    C.ON.S.I.E.N.C.E presente : les 15 projets
    project travail
    -motivation : beaucoup de gens trouvent leur boulot ennuyante parce que la marché libre ne donne pas asseze du travail/avoir du travail n'est pas encore un droit/on peut pas façillement changer son travail, parce qu'il y en a pas assez/ Dans un économy standardisé, le compétivité ne sera pas basé sur l'exploitation puisque les conditions seront les même pour tous. Les Resources Humaines, les administrations personnels travaillent encore avec trop de différents statuts et réglements. Il faudrait les simplifier et standardiser.
    -demandes : LE DROIT SUR UN EMPLOI AVEC UN SENS/MEME TRAVAIL MEME SALAIRE/LES ETUDIANTS DOIVENT ETRE PAYE AUSSI/
    project telecom
    -motivatie : pour l'administration des projects les moyens technologique ne sont pas standardisés, l'internet est trop utilisés uniquement pour des raisons commerciales
    -demandes : la création d'un Système Universel Telematique pour le Gestion des projects (TUMS)un système pour l'administration et organisation des projects. Pour coordiner et controler chaque gouvernemt et entreprise devait empoyer le même système.pour savoir qui veut quelle emploie et quoi et où, pour savoir le demande de tous les produits et services. La population pourrait mondiale suivre ces données. TUMS serait le project pour intégrer les 15 projects et le pour gerer le secteur telecom.
    Une campagne d'alfabetisations devrait être organisée pour tout le monde.
    project transport

    -motovation :pour mettre fin à la polution, le transport publique doit devenir principale
    -demandes : une petite taxe standardisé ferait le transport publique presque gratuit
    project sécurité
    -motivation : il y aurait moins de crime parce que tot le monde aura une emploie/ mettre un fin aux guerres
    -demandes : abolition des guerres/ reconversion de l'industrie d'armement/les armées vont être utilisés pour aider en cas de désastres naturelles, grands tavaux publiques pour empecher ses désastres/seulement la police a le droit de porter des armes
    project production
    -motivation : au lieu de colaborer, il ya de guerres entres les entreprises, les victimes en sont les chomeurs, les accidents de travails et les individus et familles avec trop de stress
    -demandes : les gérants devraient utiliser le système TUMS pour rendre l'information de leur entreprises accesible pour tot le monde : stockage, prix, demandes de personnels... . Les producents devrraient se réunir par group de product. Des messures pour éviter le gaspilage et la pollution devraient être pris.
    project distribution
    -motivation : trop de spéculation
    -demandes : même prix pour même produits ou service/ création des données télématique pour savoir ou se trouvent quels produits et lequel et le moyen de transports le plus éfficient
    project maison
    -motivation : des millions vivent dans des conditions inhumaines ou payent trop de loyer
    -demandes : inventarisation des maisons nécessaires, à reparer, construire.../tarifs sociales, pas de spéculation
    project nouriture
    -motivation : le vieux système invente des lois pour détruire la nouriture pour des raisons spéculatives et promote parfois ne pas producer la nouriture
    -demandes : de la nouriture pour tout le monde en unifiant tous les efforts d'agriculture sur une échelle mondiale/ tous ceux qui travaillent dans ce secteur doivent recevoir une salaire uniforme s'ils travaillent leur terrains bien
    project milieu
    -motivation : reduire la pollution
    -demandes : pas de surconsumation/triage immondices/recyclage/transport publique/entretiens des parcs nature/lois pour protéger les annimaux/plus d'energie propre...
    project enseignement
    -motivation : ne pas épargner sur l'enseignement, les pays pauvres doivent avoir des conditions commes
    dans les autres pays pour enseigner
    -demandes : pas trop d'élèves dans une classe/plus d'attention aus sciences humaines : philosophie, histoire, psychologie.../plus d'échangement entre entreprises et l'enseignement/enseignement pour adultes aussi/enseignement doit aussi apprendre à interpreter les medias objectivement
    project energie
    -motivation : trop de gaspilage et pollution
    -demandes : invester dans l'energie propre
    project argent
    -motivation : l'aspect spéculative a des conséquences désastreuse dans le monde
    -demandes : uniquement utilisation administrative de l'argent/une monnaie mondiale avec la même valeur partout/les banques doivent s'unir

    project gestion de la société
    -motivation : les décisions sur qui a le droit de travailler ou guerre ou pas de guerre...sont toujours pris par l'élite politique. Les dirigents politique ne peuvent pas faire une politique qui va contre le program globale. Ceux qui prennent les décisions dans les parties politiques et les syndicats suivent toujours ce que les spéculants veulent . On tourne dans des petits rond au lieu de résoudre les problèmes sur d'une façon mondiale. Si on va suivre leur logique, cela voudrait dire qu'on dois tous aller travailler pour le salaire le plus bas du monde...leur capitalisme éfondrait vite alors. Ils existent des groupes qui veulent prendre une autre chemin, mais ils sont divisé sur l'interpétation de l'histoire et sur les tactiques à suivre et ils bordurent uniquement sur le bataille classique des syndicats : des bon salaires sans connection mondiale et alternative globale
    -demandes : tous les demandes des autres projects/ organisation des éléctions alternatives sur internets ou pression des comités sur les gouvernements nationaux ou administrations communales ou syndicats/
    propagande poutr un nouveau système d'éléctions internationale: d'abord pour une programme mondiale et après pour les dirigents. Pour neutraliser le boycot des grands speculateurs il y aura pas des nationalisations. Sur le project 'gestion de la société' on pourra elire les dirigents por la justice, pour l'administration de la population et le premier qui aura une fonction coordinative. Un jour les éléctions des dirigents de projects remplaceraient les élections classique et par project et province quelqu'n sera envoyé au gouvernement continentale. Le gouvernement continentale formerais le gouvernement mondiale. Principe de base pour organiser ces éléctions serait le nombre de habitants d'un province.
    Les comités locale pourraient avoir des moyens de controle sur leurs communes et entreprises.
    project relations
    -motivation : on devrais apprendre à travailler sans la discipline qui impose le système ancien et on devait de plus près avoir un intérets pour les problèmes de le monde de nos jours
    -demandes : accompagnement psychologique pour des problèmes subjectives entre les gens/
    des medias objectives et indépendentes du capital spéculative
    project santé
    -motivation : de nos jours on utilise trop de médicaments, c'est mieux d'attaquer les sources des maladies comme la pollution, le stress, la culture commerciale, pas assez de contact avec la nature, tensions psycholgiques
    -demandes : nouriture naturelle de bon qualité, établissement d'un infrastructure médicale dans les pays pauvres, des soins médicale pour tout le monde (petite contribution de tout le monde)
    Plan d'action
    Si la volonté et la nécessite pour discuter l'alternative collectiviste devient plus claire on peut commencer à inventer des actions. Organiser de la pression sur les mandataires politiques classique,
    des arrêts de travails pour discuter l'alternative. Exiger du patronat qu'il paye les mêmes salaires dans les pays pauvres... . Des manifestations pour exiger des Nations Unis l'abolition des guerres et de la pauvreté en imposant les demandes de l'alternative collective. Tous les premiers des différents gouvernements doivent avoir un réunion pour aux moins interdire toute spéculation dans l'économie, même salaire pour le même travail, reconversion de l'industrie militaire, etc... .